Northwest Legal Roundup

July 24th, 2008 by Shalini

The common themes in this roundup seem to be food & technology:

If you have a blog you would like to be included in this round up, let us know in the comments.

Pursuing FAME: The Value of Keeping Records For Unbillable Time

July 23rd, 2008 by Shalini

Cliff Tuttle is a Pittsburgh sole-practitioner and the author of a general legal blog with a focus on Western Pennsylvania called Pittsburgh Legal Back-talk. He has recently authored an AVVO Legal Guide on mortgage foreclosures. As you can tell from the photo on his blog and on his Avvo profile, Cliff has a robust sense of humor. Cliff believes in the importance of dedicating a part of his day to nonbillable tasks and he sent along this article on the topic.

Busy lawyers must do more than serve clients. They must manage the firm, develop future business and maintain professional competence. Most of us keep detailed time sheets for client work. But after working a full day and billing only a few hours, we often wonder what we did all day.

Keeping time for billing purposes is hard enough. So why use more of it to keep records of tasks for which you can never charge a dime? Short answer: Productivity and achieving goals.

Keeping written records has been universally demonstrated to increase productivity and facilitate the achievement of goals. If you want to improve your sales, keep a sales diary. If you are trying to lose weight, keep a food diary. Athletes keep score even while training. The act of writing down goals and recording achievements has been demonstrated to increase performance in every kind of human activity. Indisputably, it works.

As a sole practitioner, I write down daily goals and keep time in four broad non-billing areas:
FINANCE
ADMINISTRATION
MARKETING
EDUCATION

My goal is to achieve some modicum of progress - even if it is only token - in all four categories every day. Finance, among other things, includes billing and client time keeping. Administration includes all non-financial aspects of running a law office. Marketing includes relations with existing clients, plus developing new prospects. Education includes increasing a lawyer’s legal knowledge and competency, improving the value of what we have to sell.

To some extent, these activities are self-driving. When planning a day, Finance and Administration tasks may come to mind automatically. But this is far less likely for the categories of Marketing and Education. These require more proactive planning. Without some kind of a plan, Marketing and Education efforts are likely to be sporadic and haphazard. Busy weeks and months go by without addressing these vital areas of practice at all. That’s where FAME comes in.

This approach requires a written daily plan, compiled before the day’s most demanding activities take over. I insert a blank sheet of paper into each day’s section of my Day Timer. I divide it into four sections, marked F, A, M and E. At the beginning of the day, I write at least one task I plan to do that day in each category. As the day progresses, I may add more.

When I first began this routine, it seemed almost impossible to think of daily entries for the Marketing and Education categories. But with practice, ideas and then a plan began to emerge. In Marketing, I began calling clients with whom I had little or no recent contact. With a little thought, I could usually find a reason for the call that was more than a mere pretext. At the least, such calls put me back inside the client’s sphere of influence. At best, they resulted in one or more immediate assignments. Similar marketing activities could involve joining groups, giving speeches or keeping up contact with colleagues and classmates. The key is to keep doing it and to do it naturally. Check off every accomplishment and write down the time required to complete the task.

In addition, whenever you receive one of those famous ten-minute calls, the kind you can’t bill, charge the time to Marketing. Then plan a follow up with the caller a week or two later. Don’t ignore the potential for referrals. Everyone you meet or talk to on the phone has the ability to refer a friend. A referral carries the implied endorsement of the referring party, which is worth a great deal. Some people have a talent for referrals and keeping in touch with them is like owning a gold mine.

Education should consist of more than attending mandatory continuing legal education seminars. Find a blog, listserve or website dealing with a topic of value in your practice and plan to read it every day. Note the time devoted to this task under E. Sometimes I email articles or blog posts to clients or other people I think might be interested. This combines the Marketing and Education functions.

I try to review the prior week every Saturday morning and to begin to plan for the next week. It is not unusual to find four hours of FAME recorded in a given day. I try to determine whether the activities noted in my log were worth the time spent and whether some should be increased, decreased or altered. If an activity is not meeting my goals, I want to consider replacing it with one that does.

My daily focus on Marketing and Education have ultimately lead to the launch of my new blog, Pittsburgh Legal Back-talk. This demanding endeavor requires me to greatly expand the time and energy devoted to both M & E. Nevertheless, I strongly believe that it will prove to be worthwhile, personally and professionally. If you would like to see (and possibly bookmark for future reference) Pittsburgh Legal Back-talk, click here.

Awards for Sale

July 22nd, 2008 by Conrad Saam, Sr. Marketing Manager

Need another award for your law firm? Buy a plaque.

Seriously.

According to Patrick Byers at the Responsible Marketing Blog, one can be had from the US Local Business Association. Click through to read the misleading email here: Awards for Sale: Not a rewarding experience. (For the record, Avvo verifies all awards submitted to the site to ensure they are more than a snazzy piece of mahogany with gold writing.)

Throwing your computer out the window is not an option…

July 22nd, 2008 by Cristin Carey, Customer Care Manager

image by steffe via Flickr Creative Commons License

…trust me. I’ve been there and while there are many days where I find myself on the verge of dropping my computer off the side of the building because I can’t find that *one* file I need, my life (and work) without a computer is unimaginable. I have a feeling there are many lawyers out there who can relate. So we need to figure out a way to take control of our data and make it work for us in a way that allows us to focus on our real work.

David Leffler over at the APA GP/Solo blog reviews Bit Literacy - something we are familiar with here at Avvo. Bit Literacy is a book by Mark Hurst which teaches us how to manage the “bits” of information we come into contact with each day. Emails, digital photos, word documents; if its information on a computer, it’s most likely a bit.

“Solo attorneys do not have an IT department to help them manage all of their digital detritus. More often than not they do not have a secretary, either. So it is even more important that you get a handle on your digital bits before they overwhelm you—throwing your computer out the window is not an option.”

The idea here is to manage all our data in a way that makes it useful to us and helps us to be more productive. Managing data (especially email) correctly and efficienty is just as important for tech companies and lawyers as it is for anyone whose business depends on electronic communication in anyway. I know these concepts have helped me to manage a sometimes overflowing Customer Care inbox. Check out David’s post and see if it can help you too.

Don’t Call It a Comeback

July 18th, 2008 by Shalini

Thanks to Tony, Karen, Hoa and Nick - we are back - bigger and badder than ever.  Next step is to have Google recognize that we are virus free.  You may still see the message, “this site may harm your computer”, because it may take Google a bit of time to complete their review of our site.

Illinois - Public Lawyer Records to Remain Inaccessible

July 16th, 2008 by Josh King, VP of Business Development and General Counsel

The Illinois Supreme Court, in a one-line ruling, rejected Avvo’s application for the Illinois Master Roll of attorneys. We are, as you might expect, surprised and disappointed in this outcome. Although we have the vast majority of Illinois lawyer records already, we were hoping that, with the ARDC’s cooperation, we could offer Illinois consumers and attorneys the complete picture of all Illinois licensed attorneys.

Nonetheless, we respect the court’s decision, and we’ll go on providing the service in Illinois in its current form. If you are an Illinois lawyer and you can’t find your profile on Avvo drop us a note and we will manually create it. Just be sure to give us your name, as that’s the only way we can get the info from the ARDC :)

Avvo Blog Has Been Hacked

July 15th, 2008 by Shalini

Just a note to let our readers know that we are aware of “this site may be harmful” Google message.  We are working on ridding the site of the virus.  Stay tuned . . .

More Support for Avvo’s Quest for Open Records

July 15th, 2008 by Josh King, VP of Business Development and General Counsel

Great support in the Madison & St. Clair (IL) Record newspapers for Avvo’s petition to the Illinois Supreme Court for attorney licensing and disciplinary records. From the editorial:

“Giving the list to Avvo would “lead to similar requests for this information from… other entities that wish to provide information regarding attorneys to the general public,” wrote ARDC attorney Rosalyn Kaplan in a brief opposing the company’s request.

And that’s supposed to be a bad thing?”

I was wondering the same thing. From the looks of the poll on the editorial page, over two-thirds of readers agree that the ARDC should release the information to Avvo.

Avvo Superhero

July 14th, 2008 by Shalini

Peter v Chicken Poster Print

Our ears were burning last week, when we learned that Avvo was the subject of heated debate on the ABA SoloSez message boards. We were heartened to see this impassioned defense from Jonathan Stein on a variety of issues:

  • Lawyer Ratings:

Ratings are the name of the game in every profession. What do you think JD Power does for a living? Do they sit around and play tiddly winks all day?

No. Of course not. They RATE PEOPLE! Really, I promise. Go listen to some car commercial some day. Tylenol - the choice of more pediatricians. What is that? A RATING! Crest - 4 out of 5 dentists recommend it. Guess what? We call that a rating. President of the United Freaking States? Rated. Doctors?

Indian Chiefs? Teachers? All rated. Toilets? Rated. Sanitary napkins? Rated.

(Really, I checked.)

By the way, for those of you too stubborn to visit Avvo because you are afraid they will start to track you or send out black helicopters, spend a few minutes there. There is a question and answer section. And, unlike other sites, the answers are not all “Call me for a free consultation and I can help you.” There are real substantive answers. In addition, they are launching Legal Guides where attorneys write information and consumers can read it - at no charge. Oh my gosh - education for consumer that is free to the attorney and free to the consumer. And it doesn’t matter what your rating is.

 

  • Martindale-Hubbell

By the way, speaking of M-H, and I was before, how many consumers use it? Oh right, they use lawyers.com. Really? Funny, when I check for lawyers, the people who show up are the people who PAID TO BE THERE! Oh, and the M-H website never explains how they determine their ratings. I know, based on reviews by other attorneys. But, HOW? Explain it to me and use small words because I aint that bright! Interestingly, a law firm receives the rating of its HIGHEST RATED partner. So 10 CVs in a law firm as partners and 1 AV and the firm is rated AV. That seems fair, sure. And Peter Griffin seems svelt.

The image above is to refresh your memory as to whether Peter is svelte. Jonathan, your root beer is on the way.

Advice to Parties Appearing on Judge Judy

July 10th, 2008 by Shalini

I have a confession to make: I find Judge Judy very entertaining. And, apparently I’m not alone. The following are tips based on the most common errors I’ve observed on the show:

judge-judy.jpg

  • If you are a deadbeat dad, do not come before Judge Judy with the excuse that you often buy diapers, food, toys, or clothes for your children. Similarly, do not offer that you give your baby mama money for your kids whenever she asks. Judge Judy will simply remind you that this does not relieve you of your legal obligations for child support.
  • If you are being sued for repayment of a loan, do not do Judge Judy’s job for her and declare that what you were given was a gift. Judge Judy wants you to merely describe the circumstances surrounding the exchange, so she can divine the donor’s intent.
  • Different states have different laws regarding engagement rings. Unfortunately, in many jurisdictions (e.g. California), an engagement ring that accompanies a proposal is considered to be a gift given in the contemplation of marriage. So ladies, you are not automatically entitled to keep your engagement ring - even if your betrothed is the one who balks at marriage.